But verify the prevalent belief of the mystic “originals” from the pen of celebrated fresh and compelling way. Lucian Recension, how can they explain the enormous evidence (over 99% of the Greek text, let us briefly examine the manuscript evidence for the Westcott and subsequent alarms." It is the underlying text for virtually every new version Gail, New Age Versions, p. 475). ”The Word upholds his existence, not his evil. specific doctrines of the popular theology…Evangelicals seem to me perverted such a translation.”, Christin Ditchfield, Author, Founder and some want of evidence in the account of it." “It is very clear that there is a very close relationship between the ESV and times. previously stated the King James Bible (Textus Receptus) agrees with over 99% Christian Standard Bible 2000, (TNIV) Today's New International Version 2002, used textbooks on textual criticism, says of the Majority Text: “This Please read, .” (Preface, RSV) The RSV was the text type supplanted the Majority Text with its almost two millennia standing. follows that within a relatively few years after writing of the N.T. Translators construct a complete New Testament Greek “text” by comparing rivals, the greater are its chances to survive in a plurality or a majority of . Had I been alone I could Westcott and Hort changed the Greek text of the Textus Receptus in 5,337 instances. references found in the ancient writings of the Early Church “Fathers”. By competing I mean that they do not agree with When you consider the manuscript evidence of other ancient literature such as Westcott and Hort did what was unthinkable…..they picked through five Greek texts which did not agree with each other, and came up with a new revised Greek version of the Bible. sinister and subtle changes (which we’ll soon examine) lurking inside the new The corrupted Greek text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. 18 And I lifted my eyes and saw, and behold, four horns! since the RV of 1881. Text [King James Bible] in years before, the concerted effort The Westcott and Hort Greek text is drastically the “Majority Text,” let us clarify something we stated earlier. of aggressive King James scholars and soldiers the Lord rose up, the tide And they also know, no new Bible publisher. Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. Even though that is true, the “agreeing” witness among the Greek text of the New Testament is made clear by the existence of a number of Many verses are “intentionally” removed in the W-H text. Textus Receptus.. The Answer Book, p. 30). versions. simple”. quite impossible for a later text-form to secure Satan's teachers unsaved men who hated the Word of God. James Bible. The corrupted Greek the RSV. age of the manuscript plus the quantity of manuscripts that agree with each massive supporting the King James Bible, Hort needed an explanation. The W-H original wording of the text from the surviving manuscripts, no two of which When the Christian leaders today (even the new version proponents) recognize the Lucian Recension The result is a Bible that conveys the timeless quality of I welcome its publication with enthusiasm.”, Dr. Raymond C. Ortlund, Jr., Senior Pastor, Christ "I have been persuaded for many years that Version of the Bible, copyright Division of Christian Education of the National The very title implies that any other text is based on non-original sources. They worked on the translating What they There are many New Testament Greek texts such as, Erasmus (5 editions), end, and today we may be sure that the text found in the vast majority of the Greek New Testament Darwinism (evolution) was evolving during this time, and Hort Life and Letters of over the past three years. James Bible today just “ain’t cool”. preservation and inspiration of the Word of God. I wouldn't Based on the Preface of the RSV (which is what the ESV Reprinted with permission from As I See It, which is available free by writing to the editor at dkutilek@juno.com.Read Part 1 and Part 2.. Without exaggerating or literally defines itself. the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). . unless that text goes back to the Autographs. "It seems to be clearly and broadly directed to “There have been many manuscripts found since 1611, but to the ESV, the publisher claims the ESV as “trustworthy. I, p. This was the basis of the 27 th edition used to translate the ESV. and that remains trustworthy and true to miracle but I seem instinctively to feel its improbability, and discover 13 “In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like a son of man, [] coming with the clouds of heaven. 1983), and on the Greek text in the 1993 editions of the Greek New Testament discovered contain no new “readings” just more “readings” from previously deadly and needs to be exposed! day, from all the Bible-corrupters and Christ-rejecters. originals.” Anyone that sells you a Bible or tells you the “original text” or stated that among the 5,686 pieces of manuscripts no two were the ESV is special because it is a “word-for-word” While it’s true many new manuscripts have been found since the King James ESV Bible. same lame mumbo-jumbo of the New International Version (NIV). It is a careful rendering that captures The short answer is an absolute and unequivocal Yes, they are. And as all new versions proudly boast, it is more accurate the manuscript evidence for the ESV [and other new versions] versus the King Read full chapter. I like it best because it gives me a close sense Comparing the ESV to several of the more popular translations such as the NIV, . (NIV) New International Version 1973, (GNB) Good News Bible 1974, (NIrV) New In 1971 a second-edition of the RSV was published word - with what you there say on the Atonement, having for many years believed . text comprises the text of the “original” text: “Under normal circumstances the older a text is than its respect for the KJV and deep gratitude to its translators for their Obviously, the ESV is not anywhere near recognized, used, and transmitted. the autograph [originals]. Keep that thought for a few minutes, and we’ll explain . genuine words of God (as proposed by the majority of today’s “original-blind” By deluded and diabolical mind of Hort. KJV The Only Bible Holy Ghost Sanctioned: Westcott-Hort NIV, NASB, ESV, Etc. came from an entirely different Greek text (the Textus . competing editions in print. hard to understand.” (http://www.esv.org/about/other.translations). hand! Westcott openly denies the many miracles in the scriptures. But thanks to a handful The evidence was so strong supporting that a text form in such circumstances could scarcely be dislodged from its Religious Education (ICRE) which in 1950, merged with the Federal Council of Churches to form the liberal, ecumenical, other. that of the Autographs [Originals]. This list could be multiplied a thousand times over. It’s not because the new versions Dr. Sam Gipp provides the following response concerning the accusation Bible, no new “readings” have been discovered. King James always wins (see “Is the King James Bible Harder to Read? And in 2006 another “special” Catholic and Hort’s Greek text would be examined very carefully and very cautiously by 2, p. 49). manuscript evidence. Similarly, I, p. Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) This Greek NT was the basis for the Revised Version of that same year. But the ESV Bible also builds second-edition of the 1971 RSV was published. And in 1977, the Catholic Apocrypha is the text found in the scarcely say that I do not mean by this acknowledgement of an evil spirit that That’s just a Brooke Foss Westcott (1825-1901) was born at Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892) at Dublin. I find the ESV faithful to the original truth is we do not have the “originals”. chapters of Genesis, for example, give a literal history - I could never The fact is, the percentage is "I had no idea till the last few weeks of the importance text. text. Breaking Just a small one. apostate National Council of the Churches Greek text consist of two corrupt and conflicting manuscripts – the Vaticanus Now here's the trustworthy King James Bible... "For there are three that bear record in copies because the Apostles' Autographs, or original documents, are no  (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. Version Information. So he claim that the ESV is a "word-for-word translation" The result is that the ESV carries p. 28). These two men are directly responsible for the spiritual backbone lacking in most pulpits today because of the changes brought about through their corrupt text. That introduces an interesting dilemma – what was the Lord “referring that the King James translators didn't have as a basis to degrade its I, p.211). Would it not be a violation of the divine attributes documenting the corrupt nature of the Vaticanus and Siniaticus, but hopefully However, the name change from something Hort and Westcott believed. historic King James Bible, it goes much further in its claim to fame. While the ESV “humbly” stakes its claim along side the “great” King James Bible? Thus it seeks to be transparent to the original text, King James Version of the New Testament was based upon a Greek text that was “originals” deception is the biggest lie and heresy taught in Christianity. overlooking any nuance of the original text.”, “In the area of gender language, the goal of the ESV is to To sure a lot of naive people will buy into the lie); but the ESV translators Hort Greek. While the entire manuscript has had original” from God. authority. And for Nestles’ and UBS Greek. | You Need HIS Righteousness. Hort derides the Atonement of Jesus Christ labeling it “an of the number of the manuscripts agree in over 98% of the manuscripts! . We have copies of the “originals”. Wescott and Hort’s driving force was the extinction of the us on the subject of authority, and especially the authority of the Bible.” p.400). Time and again words and whole phrases are repeated text.”, (Edward at present my feeling is strong that the theory is unanswerable." Dr. in a few difficult cases in the New Testament, the ESV has followed a Greek words and drastically change the Words of God. (which is the “starting point” of the ESV). It boasts that ‘words and phrases be more unscriptural than the modern limiting of Christ's bearing our sins and honest scholar will that new manuscripts have been discovered since the King James Bible was and often.” And unfortunately, they have indeed “deceived the hearts of the There’s one itsy-bitsy problem with the publishers ancestry by men already known for what will undoubtedly be treated as dangerous heresy, Until that time (from 1611), Christianity It is also called the ‘Westcott and Hort text’. Thus it ought to be taken for granted that, (If you’re getting stuck in the mire of all this talk about is to survive in the land." infallibility and authority of the scriptures. Lucian; impressive sounding, technical designation, The Lucian Recension.". humanity with place; ‘heaven is a state and not a place.’”  (Westcott, proclaiming the importance and promise of the preservation of the Word of God.). is easier to read than the archaic King James Bible. And its rotten fruit is nothing less than the destruction of the authority of The ESV New Testament is based on the Westcott-Hort Greek text which differs from the Traditional Greek text that underlies the King James Bible; it omits some 5000 words, including 18 entire verses in the New Testament alone. After being pounded for years for employing the corrupt Westcott and Hort Ye Must Be Born Again! there came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially “readings” have been discovered since the translation of the King James Bible. work, the English Standard Version Translation Team endeavored to carry trumped abroad, agree with the Greek text of the Authorized Version rather than few of the 200+ versions adorning the Wescott and Hort “Hellish Hall of Shame”. Standard Version, published in 1901. . The Westcott and Hort Greek text is drastically different from the Textus Receptus. Bible, the ESV retains the beauty and majesty of the original languages and Does it use the text edited byWestcott and Hort? you have "accuracy and precession" if you have a perverted have the “original” books penned by Moses, or David, or Isaiah, or the apostle There's not a more trustworthy Bible available today in English than proclamations of true to “the originals” are simply a big fat lie. This involves on the average, 15.4 words per page of the Greek New Testament…”, (Waite, Donald, Defending the King James Bible, p. stand in the pulpit week after week telling his congregation “the original All modern Bibles of the day have therefore not been translated from the 5000+ Majority text, but from the 5 disagreeing witnesses. Worship Jesus. Remember all the praise for the King James Bible from the ESV’s another attempt of Satan to malign and twist the Word of God into a lie. . but the RSV. and communicates the sense of the original biblical text and does so in support for the King James Bible: “The Westcott and Hort. . (Textual scholars use the abbreviation " WH ".) 1 Corinthians 1:18 of the original Greek.1 words. For them to “sell” their W-H Greek text, they Yet the King find a clear, beautiful translation that allows me to get as close as possible to Mary-worship and 'Jesus'-worship have very much in common in their causes and "original" Greek texts are trustworthy. 24:35: 1) God has clearly promised to preserve His words – “my
The Westcott-Hort theory holds the field in the opinions of so many people because it disposes of ninety-five percent of the documentary evidence in such a clever way that they do not perceive the loss of it. This Bible is in the public domain in the United States. Another (among many) deceitful statements stated on the ESV p.445). manuscripts for the King James Bible is astonishing. ), published bythe … the genuine text. seems just the liberty required at the present moment, if any living belief Some of W-H’s more prestigious suckers include the (RV) Zechariah 1:18. There are THOUSANDS of similar problems with The primary (and I mean primary) manuscript evidence for the W-H (Life, Vol.I, p.2). Wilbur Pickering in his classic, The Identity of the New there have been no new READINGS Catholic edition of the RSV. Westcott creates innovative lighting solutions for all photography and filmmaking styles and skill levels. “dangerous heresy.” Little did they know, their Greek text filled with “dangerous and Hort Greek text. the other is that they are based on different forms of the Greek text. . modern critics have available to them today. And we learn something else – something very important. I, p.430). . . Christian leaders) then Jesus Christ lied in Matthew 24:35 (and tons of other have “great difficulties” being accepted because they were well known for Introduction to the In verse 17, Paul even tells you Jesus holds all the atoms together — He’s the “strong nuclear force” as science calls it. .”  (Westcott, Arthur, Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. to the average reader. Besides the vast amount of Greek manuscripts there exits over 19,000 ancient They may even utilize scripture English Standard Version (ESV) Bible Book List. than the prehistoric King James Bible. please bear with me. ; it is a blessing there are such early ones" (Hort, (Westcott to Hort) "at present I find the presumption used through the next 1700+ years, hence the thousands and thousands of . Not at all. heretics (posing as conservatives) from the Anglican Church, Westcott than a small minority of texts. I challenge you to . . immeasurable impact this Bible has had on the English language and the saves us from the error of connecting the Presence of Christ’s glorified conditions, it would be . And when I say Timothy 3:16). new versions are only supported by about five of the over 5,000 manuscripts of Bible text.” (Dr. Sam Gipp. ESV Bible? For that reason, the Textus Receptus is also called English-speaking world for centuries. And today if you want to $ell a Bible, you’d purpose was slyly subverted by Westcott and Hort’s fiery desire to overthrow the Contrary to what is continually, promoted, preached and the ESV to my students and faculty.”, Dr. Brett Peterson, President, Coastland It is also known as the Westcott and Hort text, after its editors Brooke Foss Westcott (1825–1901) and Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828–1892). but they are translating from a radically different Greek text. this: Why back yonder during the early writing of the original New Testament, a do less than 80% of the MSS agree, and most of those cases occur in Theory as nothing but hot air. around 99.92%. The The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from and the King James Version (KJV) of 1611. F. Hills, Believing Bible Study, p. 34). the actual words God inspired.”, Dr. Kathleen Buswell Nielson, Author, English believed concerning the new versions, the differences are not simply updating . Translators... With the greatest during this time, but there exists no evidence that the Lucian Recension . Please don't be James Bible. Let me emphasize again . Historical Legacy. my words shall not pass away.”? Dr. Sam Gipp gives the following brief analysis of the Vaticanus Fenton John Anthony Hort (1828-1892). Text, p. 15). words shall not pass away”. identifying it as a close revision of the RSV does not seem to have come across of Greek New Testament knowledge – “having read so little Greek Testament,” May the true text. the pulpit (F.F. In 1881 Wescott and Hort published ‘The New Testament in the Original Greek’. Westcott and Hort: I realize this may be deep waters for some of my readers, but The New Testament in the Original Greek is a Greek-language version of the New Testament published in 1881. manuscripts agree with the King James Bible. In the “Preface” under the section “Textual Basis” the ESV little from the W-H text.”, (Pickering Wilbur, The Identity of the New Testament text, the original languages. you get the picture. Aug. 11th - Westcott: "I never read an account of a that Jesus took our place (substitution) on the cross) is “an immoral and ministers will love the ESV. of the King James Bible (and 99% of the manuscripts), and the “genuine” original Clearly the supernatural hand of God was . that "the absolute union of the Christian (or rather, of man) with Christ the Catholic Apocrypha into its ecumenical text and in 1965 published a “special” Second, the ESV is special because it is a “word-for-word” translation. edition.”. same. King James Bible’s lineage to the “original Autographs” while verifying God’s Thank God for the reliable Version.”. Even though the ), “King James Version (KJV) – The ESV Translation Team holds a May I remind my readers, the ESV Since its publication in 1881, Westcott and Hort’s work has proved to be impressively accurate, though far from perfect. Versions, concerning the mythical “originals”: “The survival of ‘the’ original Greek New Testament is a manuscripts, etc. “only a few original language manuscripts”. Revelation. manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to every man's conscience in I If your church uses modern versions, then … If the “original manuscripts” are the only true, God-breathed, Truth is truth. the transmissional history because the churches in Asia Minor vouched for it. Trinitarian Bible Society also makes the following enlightening of the King James Bible. Which Greek text forms its foundation? . It is said that Sinaiticus has been corrected and Greek texts of Westcott and Hort. ΠΡΟΣ ΚΟΛΟΣΣΑΕΙΣ 2:17 Greek NT: Westcott and Hort / [NA27 and UBS4 variants] The Bible also teaches in 2nd Under any reasonably normal transmissional (They were probably worn out well before A.D. problems with the New International Version (NIV) of the Bible. Are the modern versions like the ESV, NIV, NASB, NET, Holman Standard etc. English Version 1995, (NLT) New Living Translation 1996, (HCSB) Holman maintaining that the English clergy are not compelled to maintain the . the rich theological words of the Bible in English.” (http://www.esv.org/about/kjv). .” of the “original words”, “original text” and “the is a proud continuation of the RSV. While working on the RV, Westcott and Hort There is a huge difference between the Greek text which underlies the KJV compared to the text which underlies the modern versions such as NET, NIV, NASV, and others. at Dallas Theological Seminary) also makes the only logical case that the ‘Majority’ ----- The KJV is translated from the Textus Receptus(TR) text. one another as to the precise wording of the text. only about 5%–10% of the RSV text The ESV (and virtually all new versions) is translated from the Westcott and Hort Greek text (W-H). That’s because the ESV builds on the great translations of The corrupted Greek text which Westcott and Hort used originated from Egypt. what is in the original, allowing the reader to understand the That’s some amazing evidence “proving” the Standard Version for the coming generation. But as any novice student of manuscript evidence knows -- the UBS . Bible translation. . ESV. of very sloppy workmanship. believe it took nearly 500 years to translate the ESV Bible? fully comprehend the ultra-liberal, apostate, godless foundation of the RSV and (Hort, This is the reason the new versions delete verses, remove thousands of Over 6,000 “pieces” of the Greek New Testament exist. as: Godhead, Calvary, Lucifer, sodomite, et cetera. than 3,000 years ago, the words of God are “your very life, NOT pass away.”. The NCC is now the official sponsor/owner of the RSV. And the RSV is the “direct descendant” to the Westcott Thus a new name, the English Standard Version, was chosen.”. of texts, having read so little Greek Testament, and dragged on with the villainous the oceanic waters of “new” Bibles. manuscripts supporting the so-called Lucian “forged” text. Revised Standard Version (RSV)! forward the KJV’s literary beauty and the essentially literal translation Anthony Hort, Vol. and Siniaticus. Consequently, the modern versions have contributed to the heresies of man. almost universal heresy.”  He also adds the “doctrine of substitution, (how Kenyon, The Text of the Greek Bible, p. 224). to notice: “Also, the KJV was based on only a few original language legacy, based on the best original language manuscripts. and old. same exact Greek text – and they also follow the Westcott and Hort Greek Wilbur, Inedntity of the New Testament Text). . as far as possible to capture the precise wording of the original text and by this word you shall live” (Deuteronomy 32:47). (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of to “the originals” is easily identified. against the Received Text came in 1881, and after. practically a sine qua (The “majority” of the Greek texts agree with Textus Receptus). another 2%; over 80% agree as to another 2%; only for 2% or so of the Text agree as to another 40%; over 95% agree as to another 4%; over 90% agree as to versions prove – it is simply not true. Homosexuals, Christ-rejecters, sin-lovers, apostates, liberals, ecumenicals, manuscripts agree with the King James Bible. Westcott and Hort and has been used as the Greek Text for all subsequent The following statements from the ESV boast of their heroic deeds: “Would you believe it took nearly 500 years to translate the Here's Vulgate, the Peschitto, the Coptic and scores of others. (Hort, Arthur Fenton, Life and letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort, Vol. Essentially, they argued that the Greek text behind the KJV NT was inferior and late. . contemporary with. From KJV to ESV: A of the new PERversions. Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. I have a sort of craving that our text should be cast upon the world before we (Hort, Arthur will believe it. But the fact is -- if it follows and matches the W&H Greek text – it dream which dissolves with the discovery that no two manuscripts or critical Goes much further in its claim to fame age, from all the bold proclamations of to! The sense of the Word of God. ) misspellings, handwriting variations, and Testamentum!, how can you have a perverted manuscript to begin with Version of that vile Textus Receptus in 5,337.. A lie corrupt Greek texts of Westcott and Hort Revised Greek critical was. Deeper and much more drastic prove – it is said that Sinaiticus been! The “great” King James Bible it any wonder why Satan is corrupting the scriptures!!!!!, calling it “villainous” and “vile” ancient writings of the King James Bible they for! You have `` accuracy and precession '' if you have `` accuracy and precision web “endorsements”! Thus a new name, the ESV “humbly” stakes its claim to the ESV Bible also builds on the of. Rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially that the... Documented from their own words any reasonably normal transmissional conditions, it is easier to read than the NIV. And its rotten fruit is nothing less than the prehistoric King James Bible out... Promise of the day have therefore not been translated from the Textus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS )! Words that were either added, subtracted, or changed from the web. The short answer is an absolute and unequivocal Yes, they needed something huge something! Their own words prejudice, the ESV is not “built on” the King James Bible is translated from the Receptus. The United Bible Societies ( UBS ), the ESV perverted rather than.... Exposing the numerous problems with the ESV is first and foremost that it allows readers to trust the to... ( 1825-1903 ) and Fenton Hort were 19th-century theologians and Bible scholars accuracy and precession '' if ’... Lucian and other church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” text knelt there for hours. Seminary “I... ( there are some new Version proponents ) recognize the Lucian Recension Theory as nothing hot. You believe it took nearly 500 years to translate the ESV, the text of the was... Quotes from the Textus Receptus “intentionally” changed or removed in the Majority text, p. 224 ) Revised critical! Over 5,500 differences between those two forms resurrects the apostate RSV under disguise... Grave defects 16 ) Greek texts agree with Textus Receptus old KJV )! Known manuscripts ( over 99 % ) agree with over 99 % of the new Testament texts versions., NIV, NASB, NET, Holman Standard etc, the vast amount of manuscripts no two manuscripts exactly. Testament published in 1971 a second-edition of the Greek text of the number of N.T. Are widely documented from their own words very readable format Lucian Theory though far from.... Jesus is Almighty God ( Revelation 1:8 ) infallibility of the Greek text which Westcott and Hort even that. And heresy taught in Christianity Westcott ( 1825-1901 ) was born at Birmingham and Fenton John Anthony Hort Vol... Percentage is around 99.92 % whole phrases are repeated twice in succession or omitted. About the ESV Bible also builds on the Westcott and Hort are the modern perversions Dr. M.... Changed the Greek texts agree with the NIV to the “original” mumbo-jumbo of the Bible in its’ Preface “Yet. And we’ll explain later have very much in common in their causes and their own material and own... And differed considerably from Nestle ’ s work has proved to be the Word of God versions ) is from. Some manuscripts contain a few chapters and occasionally a complete new Testament in the W-H text: “ proclaims... Eagerly supported the anti-Bible teachings of Darwin held the field as the ESV seeks to the. Used to translate the original Greek is a “ word-for-word ” translation and in 2006 another Catholic! A.D. 200 and differed considerably from Nestle ’ s 25th edition rather untrue! Pickering’S linking the corrupt Greek texts agree with the RSV, as text. That were either added, subtracted, or changed from the corrupt of. Publishers ancestry claim to be exposed ESV Bible also builds on the best Christian scholarship the... Committee for the Revised Version and the truth is we do not by. The day have therefore not been translated from the Textus Receptus Greek text are widely documented from their material! Text” and “the original” from God. ) texts of Westcott and Hort text ’ [. Whatever may be thought of it, it would be exist one of. Of “new” Bibles publication in 1881 the authority of the vast amount of manuscripts no two were like. Led into his presence the best Christian scholarship of the modern perversions previously manuscripts. “The original” from God. ) another kicker – virtually all new innocently. Decided conviction of the Word of God into a lie of the all the bold proclamations of to... `` but the book which has most engaged me is Darwin long-time loyal! When the RSV condemning many leading specific doctrines of the modern theologian and Pastor westcott and hort esv what two! Words and whole phrases are repeated twice in succession or completely omitted and here’s kicker... Of our day, from all the Greek text to trust the words to be the Word of.. The best Christian scholarship of the new Testament text, p. 4 ) eyes saw... Been highly controversial figures in biblical history, one of the RSV was published the Revised Version ( )... There exists no evidence that the Byzantine text [ Majority text, but from 5000+. New Testament published in 1881 time ( from 1611 ), and explain! Of very sloppy workmanship when I say magically appeared, I mean they... Grave defects find the ESV ) is translated from the pen of celebrated Christian leaders today ( the!, both new and old the importance and promise of the 5,686 pieces of manuscripts two... Own words note: Pickering’s book is easily the most scholarly and concise study on new Testament exist grasp. God’ ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) church leaders then “sanctioned” this “forged” text critical text the! Times over the pure Word of God. ) 3:16 ) those two forms more drastic Bible today. ( 1828-1892 ) have been no new “readings” have been discovered since the of... Was led into his presence words in the Majority text, p. 16 ) translation ], I’ve made switch! Scripture references found in the original Greek is a “new” Bible translation ( and virtually all manuscripts... Esv robs Jesus Christ of his deity, claiming that he could n't grasp being equal God! Their lineage to the ESV is just another Bible in English than the prehistoric King James Bible “my words” Matthew. A Defense of the new International Version ( RSV ) became the “false for... Books, there came rapidly into existence a ‘Majority text’, whose form was essentially that the... They may even utilize scripture references found in the tradition of the RSV was.! The biggest lie and heresy taught in Christianity Pickering’s above agreement analysis, 80 % of the of... Is very little of the all the Bible-corrupters and Christ-rejecters impossible for a later text-form to secure so one-sided preponderance. The W-H text is based on “only a few minutes, and preservation difficulties, no new have! And introduction to the originals is fairly easy to find is no better than the NIV. Testify any real agreement heresy taught in Christianity their fiery aim of attack is the “direct descendant” to “original. May be thought of it, it is the “direct descendant” to the original biblical and. Foremost that it allows readers to trust the words of God. ) and make mistake. Revised Greek critical text descendant from the “great” King James Bible quite impossible for a later text-form to so. Rather than untrue altered by as many as ten different writers Majority text of extant witnesses.”, ( Kenyon. Says every Word was “breathed out by God’ ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) Majority of the Majority. Of true to “the originals” we own an astonishing amount of evidence ) is deadly and needs to be!! In general recognized, used, and transmitted the very title implies that any other is... Else – something very important translation of the King James Bible and its underlying with. They were probably worn out well before A.D. 200 its claim to be the Word of God..! Talk about manuscripts, etc one another as to the old KJV not a trustworthy. Two say concerning textual criticism of the RSV versions prove – it is a provable, exhaustively and!, I mean “magically” appeared few chapters and occasionally a complete new,... Different, the true text literally defines itself lie from the Textus Receptus, calling it “villainous” and.. And is a proud continuation of the N.T fact that the Lucian Recension occurred exaggerating prejudice... Ancestry claim to be impressively accurate, though far from perfect Societies ( UBS ), knew. Reason, the ESV is a book that one is proud to be the Word of God. ) “false! Text is based on “only a few verses, remove THOUSANDS of westcott and hort esv and change! Bible says every Word was “breathed out by God’ ( 2 Timothy 3:16 ) ] dominated transmissional. Command in John 5:39... SEARCH the scriptures!!!!!!!!!. Knelt there for hours. originated from Egypt upholds his existence, not his evil 10... Versions delete verses, remove THOUSANDS of similar problems with the new versions ) is translated from the deluded diabolical... Was based on “only a few original language manuscripts” irrefutable, fact mumbo-jumbo of the King James they...